Disclaimer:
The maps and text on this page have been generated by DeepAI.org and Stable Diffusion respectively. They should be considered an artistic parody of a real atlas and never be mistaken for, in any way, accurately representing the reality of the world or its people. Please do not use any of what you find here for any serious decision making, excepting, of course, for improving the artificial intelligence algorithms to more equitably represent the people and cultures of this world in all their complexity and beauty. Everything that follows this sentence has been generated by AI.
“…Even as we make this statement, this debate becomes louder and louder.”
Description
Climate change is occurring across the globe? How do we define the “science and technology community”?
Many people question this. They think it is a simple matter of what technologies are necessary or useful or beneficial, and they wonder whether we need more than the technology industry’s technological focus on research and development to protect the environment, protect property, or protect our children. But even as we make this statement, this debate becomes louder and louder.
I have done my research on this. As a scientist working with climate change, I study issues such as global warming, the global distribution of greenhouse gas emissions, and the role of information. That’s where this debate becomes complicated. I have not included data on those topics, but I have studied the literature before making this statement, to measure the response of nontechnical people regarding the science, technology, and environment they believe has been lost, or have failed. I am talking about scientists who have found it difficult to accept the fact that, for example, the current data suggest that global CO 2 concentrations have increased only slightly more than 10% so far this century and are likely to decline substantially or become much more common in the future. They are also aware that it is not known how the levels in the atmosphere would be affected by the end of this century or who will benefit in reaching such limits. I have yet to address these concerns. I have not defined how much damage and carbon dioxide emissions would be needed, how much human activity would be